oct 6

Jelani Pritchard

Professor Werry

6 Oct. 2014

Carey Response

1. Students that graduate  from For-Profit schools have a hard time paying back loans - Carey provides statistical evidence for this claim.

2. For-Profit schools seem to focus more on running like a business than providing students with benefits - Carey provides statistical data and also information on how an entrepreneur operates with for-profit schools.

3. Government is not a subsidy at all - Carey provides strong statistical data (90/10 rule stat) that helps support his claim.

1.  Abusive For-profit schools needs to stop crushing students with loan debts in exchange for low degree value

2. For-profit schools wants to provide students with courses that traditional colleges cannot - Carey explains how traditional schools are bankrupt or do not have enough money to have certain courses while for-profit schools do.

3. For-profit schools are here to stay and have accreditation - Carey provides several statements from Tom Hankin  (educational committee chairman and Michael Clifford (entrepreneur)

* i would like to investigate more on how the government will be involved with how for-profit schools cause major debt upon students.